What kind of leader is hillary clinton




















As an undergraduate at Wellesley College, Hillary mixed academic excellence with school government. They married in Their daughter, Chelsea, was born in She continued to be a leading advocate for expanding health insurance coverage, ensuring children are properly immunized, and raising public awareness of health issues. As First Lady, her public involvement with many activities sometimes led to controversy. With over one million supporters who believe in her abilities to lead, Hillary Clinton possesses the qualities that meet the leadership criteria that would help her to become the leader of the free world.

I choose to research Hillary Clinton because I admire the drive and passion she puts into her work. She is a unique global leader whose activism has promoted social change around the world. She invented herself as a public figure through her dedication to human rights and equality. Over the last three decades she has gained the respect and admiration of people around the world.

She has spent a career working towards improving people's lives. Classic leaders like Hillary Clinton have vision, passion, and integrity. These three things are the basic ingredients that Bennis proposes that most great leaders have in common. These are all aspects of leadership that allow people to better understand themselves and the world around them. WND Commentary. Hillary Clinton's Career of Comebacks. Perception of leadership styles and trust across cultures and gender: A comparative study on barack obama and hillary clinton.

South Asian Journal of Management, 18 2 , Leadership secrets of Hillary Clinton. New York: McGraw-Hill. Get Access. The Iraq War mars her record, and the private email server and the Goldman Sachs paydays frustrate even her admirers. Polls show most Americans doubt her basic honesty. And then there is the Hillary Clinton described to me by people who have worked with her, people I admire, people who understand Washington in ways I never will.

Their Hillary Clinton is spoken of in superlatives: brilliant, funny, thoughtful, effective. She inspires a rare loyalty in ex-staff, and an unusual protectiveness even among former foes. Obama administration officials, up to and including the president, badly want to see her win — there is something in the way she acted after the election, in the soldier she became and the colleague she showed herself to be, that has curdled the pride they felt in winning the primary into something close to guilt.

This is the Gap I set out to understand. Every single one acknowledged its existence. Many were frustrated and confused by it. So, too, is Clinton herself. We spoke for 40 minutes on a hot day in Raleigh, North Carolina , and it was clearly on her mind as she looks at the daily polls you can watch video of our full interview here. Her explanation for the Gap is simple enough. Other politicians find themselves under continuous assault, but their poll numbers strengthen amid campaigns.

So too did George W. All three sustained attacks. All three endured opponents lobbing a mix of true and false accusations. But all three seemed boosted by running for the job — if anything, people preferred watching them campaign to watching them govern.

Hillary Clinton is just the opposite. There is something about her persona that seems uniquely vulnerable to campaigning; something is getting lost in the Gap. The answers startled me in their consistency. Every single person brought up, in some way or another, the exact same quality they feel leads Clinton to excel in governance and struggle in campaigns.

On the one hand, that makes my job as a reporter easy. There actually is an answer to the question. After hearing it five, six, seven times, I got annoyed by it. But after hearing it 11, 12, 15 times, I began to take it seriously, ask more questions about it. And as I did, the Gap began to make more sense. Modern presidential campaigns are built to reward people who are really, really good at talking. What would you do? When Hillary Clinton ran for the Senate in , she tried to do something very strange: She tried to campaign by listening.

The frustration pulses through the piece. What the hell is a listening tour, anyway? Is it just one more way a secretive politician who combines radical views with a crippling fear of controversy can hide her true beliefs? How will anyone get close to her? Clinton began her campaign with a listening tour, as well, and it is worth considering the possibility that these tours are not simply bullshit.

When the appointed day arrived, Clinton had laid out two card tables alongside two huge suitcases. She opened the suitcases, and they were stuffed with newspaper clippings, position papers, random scraps of paper.

It turned out that Clinton, in her travels, stuffed notes from her conversations and her reading into suitcases, and every few months she dumped the stray paper on the floor of her Senate office and picked through it with her staff.

The card tables were for categorization: scraps of paper related to the environment went here, crumpled clippings related to military families there. These notes, Rubiner recalls, really did lead to legislation. Clinton took seriously the things she was told, the things she read, the things she saw.

She made her team follow up. If we were judging her leadership skill based on the trait theory, we would likely conclude that Hillary Clinton possesses what it takes to succeed as a leader. Final Benghazi report details administration failures.

Laura Meckler. Northouse, P. Los Angeles : Sage Publications. Retrieved September 11, , from. You must be logged in to post a comment. Home Blog About. References H.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000