The sociological perspective emphasizes that our social backgrounds influence our attitudes, behaviors, and life chances. The chances of committing even an individual act such as suicide depend to some degree on the group backgrounds from which we come. For every sociological generalization, there are many exceptions.
Personal experience, common sense, and the media are all valuable sources of knowledge about various aspects of society, but they often present a limited or distorted view of these aspects. A theme of sociology is the debunking motif. This means that sociological knowledge aims to look beyond on-the-surface understandings of social reality. According to C. Wright Mills, the sociological imagination involves the ability to realize that personal troubles are rooted in problems in the larger social structure.
These founders of sociology were some of the earliest individuals to employ what C. Wright Mills a prominent mid th century American sociologist would later call the sociological imagination: the ability to situate personal troubles and life trajectories within an informed framework of larger social processes.
The term sociological imagination describes the type of insight offered by the discipline of sociology. Karl Marx : Karl Marx, another one of the founders of sociology, used his sociological imagination to understand and critique industrial society. In describing the sociological imagination, Mills asserted the following. The sociological imagination enables its possessor to understand the larger historical scene in terms of its meaning for the inner life and the external career of a variety of individuals.
As Mills saw it, the sociological imagination helped individuals cope with the social world by enabling them to step outside their own, personal, self-centered view of the world. By employing the sociological imagination, individual people are forced to perceive, from an objective position, events and social structures that influence behavior, attitudes, and culture.
In the decades after Mills, other scholars have employed the term to describe the sociological approach in a more general way. Another way of defining the sociological imagination is the understanding that social outcomes are shaped by social context, actors, and actions. Early sociological studies were thought to be similar to the natural sciences due to their use of empiricism and the scientific method. Early sociological studies considered the field of sociology to be similar to the natural sciences, like physics or biology.
As a result, many researchers argued that the methodology used in the natural sciences was perfectly suited for use in the social sciences. The effect of employing the scientific method and stressing empiricism was the distinction of sociology from theology, philosophy, and metaphysics. This also resulted in sociology being recognized as an empirical science.
This early sociological approach, supported by August Comte, led to positivism, an idea that data derived from sensory experience and that logical and mathematical treatments of such data are together the exclusive source of all authentic knowledge.
The goal of positivism, like the natural sciences, is prediction. The goal of predicting human behavior was quickly realized to be a bit lofty. Scientists like Wilhelm Dilthey and Heinrich Rickert argued that the natural world differs from the social world; human society has culture, unlike the societies of most other animals. The behavior of ants and wolves, for example, is primarily based on genetic instructions and is not passed from generation to generation through socialization. As a result, an additional goal was proposed for sociology.
Max Weber and Wilhelm Dilthey introduced the concept of verstehen. The goal of verstehen is less to predict behavior than it is to understand behavior. Weber said that he was after meaningful social action, not simply statistical or mathematical knowledge about society.
Arriving at a verstehen -like understanding of society thus involves not only quantitative approaches, but more interpretive, qualitative approaches. Any animal as complex as humans is bound to be difficult to fully comprehend.
Humans, human society, and human culture are all constantly changing, which means the social sciences will constantly be works in progress. The contrast between positivist sociology and the verstehen approach has been reformulated in modern sociology as a distinction between quantitative and qualitative methodological approaches, respectively. Quantitative sociology is generally a numerical approach to understanding human behavior.
Surveys with large numbers of participants are aggregated into data sets and analyzed using statistics, allowing researchers to discern patterns in human behavior.
Qualitative sociology generally opts for depth over breadth. Problems in society thus help account for problems that individuals experience. Sociologists today employ three primary theoretical perspectives: the symbolic interactionist perspective, the functionalist perspective, and the conflict perspective.
These perspectives offer sociologists theoretical paradigms for explaining how society influences people, and vice versa. Functionalists view society as a system in which all parts work—or function—together to create society as a whole. Sociologists study the changes of society by looking at different perspectives that focus on specific small events and larger social patterns.
For example, crime is dysfunctional in that it is associated with physical violence, loss of property, and fear. But according to Durkheim and other functionalists, crime is also functional for society because it leads to heightened awareness of shared moral bonds and increased social cohesion.
Functionalism, in social sciences, theory based on the premise that all aspects of a society—institutions, roles, norms, etc. Functionalism, also called structural-functional theory, sees society as a structure with interrelated parts designed to meet the biological and social needs of the individuals in that society. Structural functionalism.
Assumptions: The conceptual assumptions underlying the approach can be divided into two basic areas: the social system is the prior causal reality and the system parts are functionally interrelated, all social phenomena have functions for the larger social system. A sociological approach also focuses our attention on how educational experiences may be differentiated by our social groups — for example, a young white man may experience university very differently from an older black woman.
In addition, it explores the impact of education itself on how social groups are formed. A functionalist will put an emphasis on positive aspects of schools such as socialisation: the learning of skills and attitudes in school.
Education helps maintain society by socialising young people into values of achievement, competition and equality of opportunity. Sociology is a scientific endeavor with a strong humanistic bent. The old nation that whether sociology is scientific or humanistic has been replaced by the modem view that it is scientific and humanistic both. As a scientific discipline, it aims at value-free and objective causal analysis of social phenomena.
It tries to generate general laws and make predictions. Humanistic perspective, on the other hand, tries to emphasise on Verstehen understanding through reflexivity the humanistic ethos and cultural creativity of all forms of social existence rather than on predictions.
Like psychology, sociology is not interested in behaviour of an individual suicide by a single person but in the patterns of behaviour suicide patterns or the behaviour of group of persons. Sociology is concerned with how the structure of society is created, maintained and changed. Sociology tries to investigate the processes through which society shapes the individual and in turn individuals create the structure of society. Sociology studies social phenomena from holistic and relational points of view both.
This perspective enables sociologists to identify underlying recurrent patterns of and influences on social behaviour. Sociology studies human behaviour in group context. Sociological perspective is neither Utopian what is desirable , nor fatalistic inevitability of existing state of affairs , hut scientific what it is, how it is and why it is.
But at times, it sometimes goes beyond the questions of what, how, why and where and assumes the role of an applied science. Thus, sociological perspective is naturalistic pure scientific and interventionist applied or social engineering both. Early sociologists were positivists, emphasised its naturalistic character, but modem sociologists humanists argue that sociologists should adopt the role of an interventionist wherever is necessary along with his traditional role of a scientist.
0コメント